Sci-Fi Films of the 1920s
In the ’20s, space flight was not an everyday topic; few people had even considered it, and then, mostly those of the literary class. So the few attempts in the ’20s at cinematic depiction of the idea were necessarily groundbreaking. Authors such as Verne and Wells were the primary sources of ideas — but they talked about travel by cannon or balloon. It was only in the ’20s that a practicable means of space travel was discussed: that by rocket.
Most films of the ’20s are silent, employing intertitles to indicate dialog or explain scenes. Films with (partial) sound tracks appeared only in the last years of the decade.
Silent films have an advantage, that they are very easy to internationalize: usually, translating the language is just a matter of replacing the intertitles. A popular silent film could circle the globe in weeks.
A tragedy has befallen the majority of films of this time: their celluloid medium had a rather short shelf life, and simply crumbled to dust, and moreover, few people at the time thought that an old movie might be valuable in the future. The result is that many big productions, even popular ones, are known only from their advertisements. This list would otherwise contain entries for Il mostro di Frankenstein. The film L’uomo meccanico is only partially recovered.
Researchers and archivists, through huge efforts, have mostly reassembled from remaining fragments some very important films that had been thought lost.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
1920 Famous Players-Lasky Corporation
OK morality play horror
silent
directed | John S. Robertson |
produced | Adolph Zukor Jesse L. Lasky |
scenario | Clara S. Beranger |
based on | Robert Lewis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde |
photographed | Roy F. Overbaugh |
architecture | Robert M. Haas |
decorations | Charles O. Seessel |
John Barrymore | as Dr. Henry Jekyll |
John Barrymore | as Mr. Edward Hyde |
Brandon Hurst | as Sir George Carewe |
Martha Mansfield | as Millicent Carewe |
Charles Willis Lane | as Dr. Richard Lanyon |
Cecil Clovelly | as Edward Enfield |
Nita Naldi | as Gina |
Louis Wolheim | music hall proprietor |
Is it science fiction?
To separate the good and evil natures of man… using a somehow scientifically developed drug. So it is science fiction.
He takes the drug himself. (For science?)
Barrymore transforms before our eyes, contorting his face. (In contrast, the 1932 adaptation has Jekyll transform almost to an animal, by use of lots of latex.)
Note: there had been already at least five direct film adaptations of the story. Another was produced the same year as this, and more every decade after, and spin-offs, besides.
The film is in the public domain in the U.S., and copies are available on-line.
L’uomo meccanico
The mechanical man
1921 Milano Film
−− criminals use robots for evil
silent
directed | André Deed |
Andre Deed | as Saltarello |
Valentina Frascaroli | as Mado |
Mathilde Lambert | as Elena D’Ara |
Gabriel Moreau | as Prof. D’Ara |
Ferdinando Vivas-May | |
Giulia Costa |
Less than half of the film has been recovered. Copies are available on the Internet, however.
A scientist creates a big mechanical man, which the criminal Mado uses to commit terrible crimes.
Аэли́та
Aelita, Queen of Mars
1924 Межрабпом-Русь (Mezhrabpom-Rus)
− dream of society on Mars
silent
directed | Yakov Protazanov |
wrote | Fedor Ozep |
based on | novel by Aleksey Nikolayevich Tolstoy |
photography | Emil Schünemann,
Yuri Zhelyabuzhsky |
Yuliya Solntseva | as Aelita |
Igor Ilyinsky | as Kravtsov |
Nikolai Tseretelli | as Los /
Evgeni Spiridonov |
Nikolay Batalov | as Gusev |
Vera Orlova | as Nurse Masha |
Vera Kuindzhi | as Natasha |
Pavel Pol | as Viktor Erlich |
Konstantin Eggert | as Tuskub |
Yuri Zavadsky | as Gol |
Aleksandra Peregonets | as Ikhoshka |
Sofya Levitina | as President, House Committee |
Date: 1921
Radio stations around the world receive strange signals. In Russia, they joke that the message might be from Mars.
The sets and outfits are pretty wild, extravagant.
Is it really sci-fi? Inasmuch as it all turns out to be a dream, not really: it is, explicitly, fantasy. There’s little science to the fantasy, only the idea that travel to Mars, and being on Mars, might be possible would now be deemed science fiction. (At the time, few could have made the distinction, though.)
Wunder der Schöpfung
(Our Heavenly Bodies
or
A Trip to the Planets)
1925 Kulturfilm
+ science education with sci-fi fantasy
silent
directed | Hanns Walter Kornblum |
wrote | Hanns Walter Kornblum, Ernst Krieger |
Paul Bildt | |
Willy Kaiser-Heyl | |
Theodor Loos | |
Oscar Marion |
This is the best, most complete, dissemination of its time about the cosmos, and very much a forerunner of Carl Sagan’s series Cosmos. The science fiction is only a fantastical segment of what is otherwise a science documentary.
Vehicle: a “phantasyship” with electric motors (later called a “spaceship”). A curious contraption, looking like a combination airship and submarine, in a sort of globe.
Features what appears to be footage from rocket or balloon launches; a depiction of launch of the spaceship from a futuristic city.
The spaceship lands on Mars, where men crawl out, and proceed to bounce around as though on trampolines. They go on to travel to the speed of light and beyond, and visit different sorts of stars. They travel as far as the edge of the Milky Way… beyond which the film speculates whether there is anything at all. This is because, until the year the film was being made, the fact that other galaxies lie outside the Milky Way was still a matter of debate.
About Sagan’s Cosmos: The similarities are very strong: Sagan had his “Ship of the Imagination” in which he explores the cosmos.
Could he have seen this film? I have my doubts. By the time he was an adult, the film was well and lost, and a big war had been fought. Could he have seen it as a child? A German import into the U.S., between the wars? Could he have talked with someone who had seen it? This last possibility seems very strong to me: an expatriate German scientist, filled with wonder at an old educational film he had seen in his home country.
The Lost World
1925 First National Pictures, Inc.
+ dinosaurs discovered
silent, with stop-action
director | Harry O. Hoyt |
producer | Earl Hudson |
supervisor | Earl Hudson |
screenplay | Marion Fairfax |
photography | Arthur Edeson |
sets and architecture | Milton Menasco |
film editor | George McGuire |
based on | Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Lost World |
an appearance by | Arthur Conan Doyle |
Bessie Love | as Paula White |
Lewis Stone | as Sir John Roxton |
Wallace Beery | as Prof. Challenger |
Lloyd Hughes | as Ed Malone |
Alma Bennett | as Gladys Hungerford |
Arthur Hoyt | as Prof. Summerlee |
Margaret McWade | as Mrs. Challenger |
Bull Montana | ape-man |
Finch Smiles | as Austin |
Jules Cowles | as Zambo |
George Bunny | as Colin McArdle |
Charles Wellsley | as Maj. Hibbard |
Jacko | himself |
This is the first full-length dinosaur movie, and generally a very fine production. A few scenes of the stop-motion dinosaurs are all most people have seen of it. But this is an epic action-adventure, with character development and an arc, and seen in its entirety, it’s pretty entertaining.
The animations are excellent — the dinosaurs breathe and emote. They’re at least as good as anything that appeared until Harryhausen’s animations of the ’60s.
Place: “…somewhere beyond the reaches of the Amazon”
Like many of the films of the era, the originals of this film were lost,
and most of the copies disintegrated in time.
Only a few scenes reappeared over the years (sometimes as a cheap and
fast way to insert dinosaurs, sometimes as ridicule of old-time filmmaking).
Researchers found eight partial copies, only by carefully searching many
film archives; this sufficed to restore most of the original.
My edition is:
2000 Edition Produced by Serge Bromberg, David Shepard
Restoration Editor Mathieu Duboscq
Lobster Films, Paris
The acting of the principals is very good, given the styles of the times. Challenger and White are particularly believable.
On the other hand, the portrayal of South American natives is poor. There’s a girl who might belong in a Mexican cantina, except for her grass skirt, and a guide played by a white man in blackface. Was this really necessary?
Before the team even reaches the land of the dinosaurs, they are beset by a band of fanged ape-men and chimpanzees! Well, ape-men appeared in the book, and presumably, the chimp represents an ape-man. For me, it detracts from the main premise.
The dinosaur menagerie includes: pterodactyl, brontosaurus, allosaurus (who beats up on … a duck-bill something), triceratops and baby, triceratops with spiny shield.
It’s a girl who gets the ball rolling, of course:
“I will only marry a man of great deeds and strange experiences — a man who can look death in the face without flinching!”
(And she returns to playing with her cat with a mouse on a string.)
Metropolis
1927 UFA
++ future class society & androids
silent
director | Fritz Lang |
set design | Otto Hunte, Erich Kettelhut, Karl Vollbrecht |
camera | Karl Freund, Günther Rittau. |
special effects | Konstantin Tshetwerikoff |
combination process | Eugen Schüfftan |
based on | Thea von Harbou’s novel |
screenplay | Thea von Harbou |
Alfred Abel | as Joh Fredersen |
Gustav Fröhlich | as Freder, Fredersen’s son |
Fritz Rasp | as the Thin Man |
Theodor Loos | as Josaphat |
Erwin Biswanger | as 11811 |
Heinrich George | as Grot, guardian of the Heart Machine |
Brigitte Helm | as Maria |
This is a great film that has affected science fiction films ever since. It’s also a great story.
Most of the original film was lost or destroyed. Researchers reconstructed the film from fragments of prints that they discovered over the years. Some sequences are known only from one low-quality damaged print. Some sequences of the film may be lost for good.
The style is high Art Deco.
Titanic machines, cityscapes. Elevated roadways and rail lines; biplanes fly between buildings. The boss communicates with a 2-way video screen.
Armies of workers, heads bowed, are barely able to step in line. The workers’ city is deep below. At the “Club of the Sons”, sons of the rich exercise, and damsels entertain them. You know this isn’t going to go well.
The son, Freder, of the richest guy, there meets Maria, who is just trying to get them to help poor kids, and there is your boy-meets-girl.
Choreographed workers operate a huge steam machine “M-Machine”. A worker falters, and it overheats, men are thrown everywhere! Before Freder’s eyes the machine becomes the man-devouring Moloch!
The machine-woman is, in the film, a re-creation of the Inventor’s lost wife, Hel. This aspect is like the Frankenstein story. But there is more than one guy mad with his own badness: Fredersen wants to use her to crush the workers. They conspire to give the machine-woman the likeness of Maria, each for his own reason.
The scene of Maria in the preparation tube was directly ripped off by The Fifth Element.
The machine-woman-Maria is much like Maria but with more mascara and a twisted smile and walk — her transformation from saintly to wicked is one of my favorite parts of the film. She raises hell among the young rich in the “Yoshiwara” district (this taken from an official prostitution district in Tokyo).
I had the pleasure of seeing the reconstructed film with a live orchestral accompaniment at the Babylon in Berlin. I can attest that musical accompaniment greatly adds to the experience.
“The mediator between the head and hands must be the heart!”
High Treason
1929 Gaumont British Picture Corp. (UK)
1930 Tiffany Productions, Inc. (USA)
OK future engineering/political fiction
different versions for silent and talking
director | Maurice Elvey |
scenario | L’Estrange Fawcett |
photography | Percey Strong |
from play by | Pemberton Billing |
Benita Hume | Evelyn Seymour |
Basil Gill | President of Europe |
Humbertson Wright | Dr. Seymour |
Jameson Thomas | Michael Deane |
Date: 1940 (talkie version), 1950 (silent intertitles)
Scenes use elaborate miniature models to depict transportation in future London. Especially, dirigibles, autogyros, other aircraft, and speedboats appear.
Some scenes take place in a tunnel across the English channel.
A fancy car appears: a rickety, very cramped, but streamlined little contraption, with two spoked wheels in front and one wheel behind. It sounds like an unmuffled 2-stroke motorcycle engine when it runs.
The politics is very silly. In the future, national borders have been erased, and replaced by “continental federations”, the main ones being “Federation of Europe” and “Atlantic States” — the latter including the U.S. and Latin American countries, but not Canada.
The provocation for war is a border shooting of booze runners (because in the Atlantic Federation U.S. alcohol prohibition is still in place.) (The only place this could have happened would have been in the present U.S.-Canadian border.)
The main message is overwhelmingly anti-war.
Ladies often wear pantsuits!
Scenes suggest someone might be nude in the privacy of their own bathroom, and scenes of ladies in their underwear. This was surely risqué at the time.
They put a lot of effort into futuristic costumes and interior design. Architecture is a fanciful, glittery Art-Deco.
There is also a protracted ballroom dance, with music that sounds very much like 1920s big-band jazz, and a swirling dance where everybody periodically freezes. One guy conducts all the band instruments, which play themselves. A couple of lady fencers take over the dance stage, and fence to the band music. (Well, why, exactly, not?)
Odd-looking, skinny, handguns keep appearing — which are also surely props.
There is “daily television news”, and a two-way video telephone.
Although the topic is explicitly international, only one (evildoing) Japanese individual has lines.
Some of the dialog is intentionally humorous (but not very funny). Overall, the dialog is pretty bad, but this is partly because this film was on the very cusp of the introduction of talkie technology.
In fact, it was originally filmed and released as a silent, but the studio insisted on a talkie version. The director re-shot many scenes, and overdubbed others, to produce a much shorter talkie for distribution in the U.S.
Evidently, I saw a restoration that incorporated both the full-length silent and the cut-down talkie versions.
Altogether, the film’s naive politics and romance, and its clumsy dialog, detract badly from the experience. Its depiction of a future world comes off better, though.
Frau im Mond
Woman in the Moon
1929 UFA
++ intrigue and moon flight
silent
direction | Fritz Lang |
screenplay | Thea von Harbou |
cinematography | Curt Courant |
head of production | Eduard Kubat |
based on | Thea von Harbou’s Frau im Mond |
artistic collaborators | Prof. Dr. Gustav Wolff, Joseph Danilowatz |
scientific collaborator | Prof. Hermann Oberth |
Willy Fritsch | as Wolf Helius |
Gerda Maurus | as astronomy student Friede Velten |
Klaus Pohl | as Prof. Georg Mannfeldt |
Fritz Rasp | as (the man who calls himself) Walter Turner |
Gustl Stark-Gstettenbaur | as Gustav |
Gustav von Wangenheim | as Eng. Hans Windeggar |
Tilla Durieux | brain and checkbook 1 |
Margarete Kupler | as Frau Hippolt |
Alexa von Porembska | a seller of violets |
Dammann | the foreman |
Gotho | renter on the 2nd floor |
Loretto | |
Maximilian | as Grotjan (chauffeur) |
Pauly | |
Karl Platen | man at the microphone |
Mahmud Terja Bey | brain and checkbook 4 |
Hermann Vallentin | brain and checkbook 2 |
Barwin Walth | brain and checkbook 5 |
Max Zilzer | brain and checkbook 3 |
Josephine | the mouse |
This is a long movie. It has plenty of time to treat the central topic of travel to the Moon, but luxuriates in complicated and dubious intrigues, both before the trip and on the Moon.
A woman wrote the story, and women figure into the action importantly. There is a cigar-munching female industrialist, a breathtakingly pretty poisoner, and Friede, who besides being an assistant and an astronomy student, serves as photographer and nurse on the mission, and voice of bravery and calm, as well as the pinnacle of a love triangle.
Reason for going to the Moon: its mountains are made of gold!
Vehicle: Friede. A stubby bullet shape, but with very long fins of boxlike construction, rectangular holes open at front and back. The film presents a nice cutaway model of the rocket, showing two levels of crew compartments in the nose, and canisters and machinery below.
Helius has already sent an unmanned register rocket H23 to the Moon, to produce a magnesium explosion visible from Earth. The H23 looks rather more like conventional rockets, except again with fins of boxlike construction.
The intertitles provide some numerical details as well as a trajectory of the flight to the Moon: 11,200 kph as an escape velocity. They point out that there is an “opposite side” to the Moon. They also mention a theory that, on that side, there is an atmosphere.
It seems they are not the first to attempt the Moon. A memorial appears, showing the names of people have tried before, and died.
The young scamp is reading a pulp fiction novel. What is barely legible:
MINGO
der
Nick Carter
der Luft
Saturn-Piraten
(Nick Carter was a detective character in pulp fiction serials. But web searches turn up no mention of Mingo.) Later, on board the rocket, he pulls out his stash of novels. They read:
Mondvampire
Das Geheimnis der unreadable Mondstrahlen
Im Kampf mit Mondkalbern
Mingos Heimkehr zur Erde
And when they arrive at the Moon, the boy exclaims “this is the way Mingo would go!”
(A book notes this literature:
Der deutsche Zukunftsroman 1918-1945:
Gattungstypologie und socialgeschichtliche Verortung,
von Dina Brandt)
The rocket rolls out of the hangar standing upright on rails.
Aerial photos of the rocket hangar are surprisingly realistic, showing aircraft wing and shadows moving over it.
“Because the spaceship is too light to stand freely,
it is submerged in a water basin in which it stands upright.”
(Why? It was standing upright until it got to the basin.)
There is a count-down to launch, and the rocket sling-shots into space!
The crew consists of: the young visionary, the feeble old professor, his pet mouse, the pretty assistant, the other assistant (her betrothed), and a scoundrel… and a young stowaway.
They experience respiratory distress and writhe a lot from the acceleration. They “dump middle rocket” partway up, which appears to be the box-shaped fins. By the time they get to escape velocity, everybody has passed out.
Scientific depictions:
They look back to see Earth from space, as almost an after-thought.
Weightlessness, difficulties of and techniques for dealing with fluids.
A scene shows Earth setting over the Moon, as they fly to the dark side.
They have to test the air to see if they can breathe it, which they do by lighting matches, which burn. No further space suits are required.
The Woman in the Moon is of course Friede.
“Laughter, gentlemen, is the argument of idiots against every new idea.”
“’Never’ does not exist for the human mind… only ‘Not yet.’”
The Mysterious Island
1929 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
+ undersea adventure
partly with soundtrack, partly with intertitles
director | Lucien Hubbard |
screenplay | Lucien Hubbard |
based on | Jules Verne’s L’Île mystérieuse |
Lionel Barrymore | as Count Dakkar |
Jacqueline Gadsden | as Sonia Dakkar |
Lloyd Hughes | as Nikolai Roget |
Montagu Love | as Falon |
Harry Gribbon | as Mikhail |
The relation of the screenplay to Verne’s book appears to be one of an explanation for the later stories L’Île mystérieuse: "Le capitaine Nemo était un indien, le prince Dakkar…" Since this film begins with a prince Dakkar building submarines, it must have been intended as background for the Verne stories.
This represents an interesting time in filmmaking: it’s a “part-talkie”, some short scenes having a soundtrack, but it also has intertitles.
As with many films of this era, even important ones, the film was thought to have been lost, but enthusiasts and archivists have reassembled enough of it to make a whole movie.
The prince launches two submarines. Giant octopuses appear, as do underwater humanoids. Also, workers wear very elaborate diving suits, somehow representing how a diving suit of the 19th century might have looked. And a woman goes out in one (unlike in Verne’s writing)!